B15 Sentra Forum banner
21 - 40 of 59 Posts

·
I'm Slushie Biotch!!
Joined
·
645 Posts
wak
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
either way ill take my sr20 over the stock not-so-spec-v wanna be se-r or a spec-v :) especially if i was to drive an auto se-r... YUCK! who woulda ever thought to put that as even an option on the car, and the person who buys an auto se-r, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING??!!!!
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
that was the entire point.... controversy isnt always a bad thing... but since were on the ECU topic, if and when an sr20 either gets swapped to an sr20det or just gets a turbo, does the ECU need to be reset or reprogrammed or will it adjust itself to the new modifications?
 

·
122 Hours Of Fear
Joined
·
13,552 Posts
2KBlackSE said:
either way ill take my sr20 over the stock not-so-spec-v wanna be se-r or a spec-v :) especially if i was to drive an auto se-r... YUCK! who woulda ever thought to put that as even an option on the car, and the person who buys an auto se-r, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING??!!!!
You have noble B15 Army intentions...lol , but don't get ahead of yourself , the SR20 motor while great , is one of many great ones out there . ;)
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
i know... i just got bored of just "answering" questions so i figure in some interesting topics ill throw an argument out there and see what it stirs up.... no real harm intended just meaningless entertainment :)
 

·
I'm Slushie Biotch!!
Joined
·
645 Posts
2KBlackSE said:
either way ill take my sr20 over the stock not-so-spec-v wanna be se-r or a spec-v :) especially if i was to drive an auto se-r... YUCK! who woulda ever thought to put that as even an option on the car, and the person who buys an auto se-r, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING??!!!!
im thinkin my car is probably faster and better looking then yours ;)
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
guaranteed it looks better... i have more dings, dents, and scratches than a beatup old ford aspire...lol...and as far as it being faster goes, u start faster so its not fair... would a neon ssx race an srt-4? would it huh, would it?! :)
 

·
I'm Slushie Biotch!!
Joined
·
645 Posts
lol...i ran a [email protected] ur a good driver and ur not auto u could beat me...COULD ;)
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
bro i have been told by many drivers that have taken professional driving courses that i am precise in my shifting and barely needto improve my launch. At the track, in about 75 degree weather at night, my best time was a 16.7 with I,E. Although i did go from a 17.3 down to a 17.1 down to a 16.7 so maybe since it was my first time there i can do better now. :) and RAPE that thing u call a "car"
 

·
I'm Slushie Biotch!!
Joined
·
645 Posts
those are some horrible times dude...can't a 5 speed SE run 15.9 stock?
 

·
I'm Slushie Biotch!!
Joined
·
645 Posts
maybe u have a qg18 LOL

those are like auto se times
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
199 Posts
2KBlackSE said:
bro i have been told by many drivers that have taken professional driving courses that i am precise in my shifting and barely needto improve my launch. At the track, in about 75 degree weather at night, my best time was a 16.7 with I,E. Although i did go from a 17.3 down to a 17.1 down to a 16.7 so maybe since it was my first time there i can do better now. :) and RAPE that thing you call a "car"
Not for nothing buuuuuut....If your as good as a driver as YOU say you are then maybe next time you rave about your driving skills you'll put your REACTION times down than what you did in the quarter. And dont take this personally cuz i was just stating a point.
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
good point.... well taken... now ur gonna make me search through all my old car paperwork... 3 file folders of it and find that damn time slips... GRRR!

ok found em, heres the times:

1st Run
RT 1.388
60' 2.632
1/4 17.273
MPH 79.00

2nd run
RT 1.265
60' 2.413
1/4 16.512
MPH 82.99

3rd run
RT 1.052
60' 2.477
1/4 16.377
MPH 83.51
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
45 Posts
2KBlackSE said:
good point.... well taken... now your gonna make me search through all my old car paperwork... 3 file folders of it and find that damn time slips... GRRR!

ok found em, heres the times:

1st Run
RT 1.388
60' 2.632
¼ 17.273
MPH 79.00

2nd run
RT 1.265
60' 2.413
¼ 16.512
MPH 82.99

3rd run
RT 1.052
60' 2.477
¼ 16.377
MPH 83.51
You need to work on your R/T before you are going to go any lower on your times
 

·
i dont wanna copy shannon
Joined
·
3,180 Posts
the best RT time of the cars i ran against was a .786 so yeah i could knock off .3-.4 right there and drop my 60' about .2 and lower my total run about .5 or so and increase the mph doing it.... so in theory with perfect driving i should be at like 15.7???
 
21 - 40 of 59 Posts
Top